(no subject)
Jul. 14th, 2005 11:17 amMany things to think about today. I slept better, thanks.
Here's an interesting rant about how there seems to be a lot of media attention on attempts to prove that feminists suck. Firstly a study that shows that people who shack up are more likely to get divorced. It mentioned that mostly women want to get married and men don't, so the men are the ones who decide if marriage actually happens. The author made a good point that the study does not show a smidge of causation in shacking up and divorce rates, and it's buried down in there that a more likely candidate for causation is low income.
There's also a reference to some Today Show interviewee who thinks the 'June Cleaver' model is coming back. Because women are happier when they can focus on their kids instead of their careers (which also coincidentally is only possible in higher-income families, as a rule). Now, I have no problem with this on the surface. I am lucky enough to get to play hausfrau in preference to being a career woman... but this has nothing to do with my vaginal status. When hub was un/underemployed, I was the main breadwinner. What irks is the assumption that women suffer because they want to have it all, so they should just get back in the kitchen dammit. Also, it's usually seen as 'family versus career', by the way, where 'family' is assumed to mean children. Spouse is optional. *pthbpbpbpbpbp*( more ranting )
Here's an interesting rant about how there seems to be a lot of media attention on attempts to prove that feminists suck. Firstly a study that shows that people who shack up are more likely to get divorced. It mentioned that mostly women want to get married and men don't, so the men are the ones who decide if marriage actually happens. The author made a good point that the study does not show a smidge of causation in shacking up and divorce rates, and it's buried down in there that a more likely candidate for causation is low income.
There's also a reference to some Today Show interviewee who thinks the 'June Cleaver' model is coming back. Because women are happier when they can focus on their kids instead of their careers (which also coincidentally is only possible in higher-income families, as a rule). Now, I have no problem with this on the surface. I am lucky enough to get to play hausfrau in preference to being a career woman... but this has nothing to do with my vaginal status. When hub was un/underemployed, I was the main breadwinner. What irks is the assumption that women suffer because they want to have it all, so they should just get back in the kitchen dammit. Also, it's usually seen as 'family versus career', by the way, where 'family' is assumed to mean children. Spouse is optional. *pthbpbpbpbpbp*( more ranting )